Here's hoping

BTW .. edited ... just found out SM also carries this


Moderators: DasPhule, Moderators
I contend it doesn't matter as long as it's nothing extreme. As long as you don't cross contaminate the tubs, the stuff will store for a long, long time at your room-temeperature bench. I have four-plus year old tubs at my bench. I also have two knives, labeled "A" and "B" respectively for the Aves. They were used when I bought my first Aves during my Ascension to the Church in 2005. They were never used in the wrong tubs and have never been cleaned (I have other clean Aves "A" and "B" knives toostarmanmm wrote:Ok.
On another point... how do you store either type of aves? Cool dark place or in the fridge?
...or, in our case, don't cross the tubs. Don't dip from the tubs with your hands either, as that makes you contaminate the "A" tub with "B" tub goodness and vice-versa via the Aves residue on your hands. I used the same putty discipline with my old Elmer's epoxy putty and my Milliput. As soon as I got the Elmers way back in the 20th century, I noticed it was hard where the black and white ribbons met (they weren't separated). "Eureka!" I thought, "I'll separate them." Guess what? They still work great for making little rocks and as filler/groundwork base and, with their little "black" and "white" labeled plastic knives, are still nice and pliable 14-plus years later in their separated containers (I used it last summer on my AFS Mk I display base). I graduated to Milliput and then ascended to Aves, and all is well. But, always, always cut with separate, designated knives, keep the hands out of the tubs/ribbons. and your Aves will serve you well. I have Aves "A" and "B" knives by color, Milliput "Blue" and "white" knives and,of course, the old Elmer's "black" and "white" labeled plastic knives.Egon Spangler wrote:Don't cross the streams
When it is dry, it is plastic. It is, as Terry tells me, an amide based epoxy polymer. Mix it together, let it set, and it is comparable to solid styrene. As long as the area is clean (no dust, oil, etc..) and is not too glossy to prevent the stuff from grabbing hold, it will hold fast. The stuff's not an adhesive, per se; think of the Apoxie Sculpt as a sculpting medium, as that is what it is for. It excels at filling big gaps, as it grabs hold tight and, when dry, is essentially the same density as resin or styrene.strangelove wrote:What is the bonding strength of Apoxie Sculpt?
I have to realign a nacelle on my 33 inch PL Enterprise. The nacelle is attatched, but I have cut a 1/32 inch channel on both sides of the pylon near its base so I can realign it (The channel does not cut all the way through the pylon). Now I need something to fill the narrow cut and hold the pylon in place.
I may have to make a wider channel in the pylon to allow more adhesive to sit in it and create a bound, we shall see.
In the meantime, is this plan pure folly?
Thank again,
Yes. Trek guys use it around the base of warp pylons. I sink display rod sockets in it and let it dry for posing stuff in flight. Another example is on aircraft on the ground - replace the uncarraiage's connecting post with a pin and make an accompanying Aves-and-tubing-socket for said undercarriage and pin. It's nice for heavy, resin builds where movement, and hence shearing off of the kit's undercarriage posts could be a concern. Again, just make sure the area is clean and not dusty - as you would do with any scultping medium or filler - and you will be amazed.Thomas E. Johnson wrote:So we can use it as a reinforcing agent then in high stress areas?
The polymer isn't amide-based. The dehydration reaction binding creating polymers is amide-catalyzed. Hence the corn chip aroma.Lt. Z0mBe wrote:It is, as Terry tells me, an amide based epoxy polymer.
...uh-huh.... sure....TER-OR wrote:The polymer isn't amide-based. The dehydration reaction binding creating polymers is amide-catalyzed. Hence the corn chip aroma.Lt. Z0mBe wrote:It is, as Terry tells me, an amide based epoxy polymer.
Rough up the area, slice scratches in it, or cement anchors if you need to really have a strong surface joint. I've even used cross-bars. It's great for reinforcing thin material like vacuformed parts, and for embedding weights in irregular areas.
Ohh sure, now you're going to invoke chemistry in a faith-based discussion.TER-OR wrote:The polymer isn't amide-based. The dehydration reaction binding creating polymers is amide-catalyzed. Hence the corn chip aroma.Lt. Z0mBe wrote:It is, as Terry tells me, an amide based epoxy polymer.
Thomas E. Johnson wrote:I am now one of the faithful to this flock. This stuff works great, and sands much easier than Magic Sculpt, which seems like sanding concrete when compared to this stuff.
And Mr. Surfacer 500-fu and......Dr. Yo wrote:Thomas E. Johnson wrote:I am now one of the faithful to this flock. This stuff works great, and sands much easier than Magic Sculpt, which seems like sanding concrete when compared to this stuff.
Is that the paste or the putty you're talking about? I've used A+B putty
for years, and while I like it, it does get mighty hard when it cures.
Something that was a little softer would be a plus now that I seem to
be scratch-building about 90% of the time...( And I have gotten more
and more into Ma.K, which practically demands a high level of putty-fu...)
Dr. Yo wrote:Thomas E. Johnson wrote:I am now one of the faithful to this flock. This stuff works great, and sands much easier than Magic Sculpt, which seems like sanding concrete when compared to this stuff.
Is that the paste or the putty you're talking about? I've used A+B putty
for years, and while I like it, it does get mighty hard when it cures.
Something that was a little softer would be a plus now that I seem to
be scratch-building about 90% of the time...( And I have gotten more
and more into Ma.K, which practically demands a high level of putty-fu...)
It's the same density and hardness as styrene, and I treat is as such. I get it pretty smooth when sculpting it in, so I can usually start with 220 or 320-grit. If I need to do further sculpting with files, I start with the 180-grit diamond straight and riffler files and work up to the 360-grit.starmanmm wrote:When sanding aves.... what grit is good to start with?
I dip from "A" with the "A" knife and from "B" with the "B" knife, rolling each piece into a little ball and holding them side-by-side. I get the little balls as dense as possible prior to comparing. I find this gives the most consistent results. To answer you question, I use your method and then expand on it with an extra step to make the comparison easier.Whiteraven_2001 wrote:I read a lot of measurement-by-knife. Does anyone use anything more exact, or is it pretty much "close to equal will work?"
Well yes and no IMHO. For flat out Structural strength I'd go with the Aves that has Aluminum powder in it. A+B is great for sculpting but not so good for thin applications such as sheet form type of work. I Mostly use A+B as it is what I taugght myself to sculpt with. I tend to use Aves for filling seams etc.TER-OR wrote:A&B Putty is much harder than Aves Putty. That's not always a good thing. I find it generally a bad thing.